Prediction of Rachel Ann Jensen vs Lynn Nabors Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Ann Jensen vs L. Nabors

Rachel Ann Jensen

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

237

Best Rank

417

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Lynn Nabors

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

237

Best Rank

417

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Jensen 2 - 0 Nabors

They have played 4 sets in total, with Rachel Ann Jensen winning 4 and Lynn Nabors winning 0. The last match between Rachel Ann Jensen and Lynn Nabors was at the Amelia Island, 06-04-1992, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Rachel Ann Jensen getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Jensen	2
Nabors	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Amelia Island(04-06-92)

Stats

Rachel Ann Jensen

Lynn Nabors

(R4) ITF Midland 1(01-07-91)

Stats

Rachel Ann Jensen

Lynn Nabors

R. A. Jensen vs L. Nabors H2H Profile

R. A. Jensen	Stats	L. Nabors
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.98% (72-75)	Career Total W/L	36.11% (26-46)
1	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. A. Jensen vs L. Nabors Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lynn Nabors has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rachel Ann Jensen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lynn Nabors has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Rachel Ann Jensen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lynn Nabors has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Lynn Nabors winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Rachel Ann Jensen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 18/16), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/3). Lynn Nabors has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Rachel Ann Jensen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Lynn Nabors has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rachel Ann Jensen winning 2 times and Lynn Nabors being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Rachel Ann Jensen winning 4 and Lynn Nabors winning 0.
The last match between Rachel Ann Jensen and Lynn Nabors was at the Amelia Island, 06-04-1992, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Rachel Ann Jensen getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rachel Ann Jensen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Lynn Nabors has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lynn Nabors has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Rachel Ann Jensen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lynn Nabors has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Rachel Ann Jensen vs Lynn Nabors Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. A. Jensen vs L. Nabors H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. A. Jensen	Stats	L. Nabors
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

R. A. Jensen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Houston - 10-04-1995
Q1 Alix CreekA. Creek	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Jakarta - 02-01-1995
Q1 Elena TatarkovaE. Tatarkova	L	2-6 7-6 6-0	Stats
ITF Nuriootpa - 05-12-1994
Q1 Justine HodderJ. Hodder	L	6-3 2-1 RET	Stats
ITF Port Pirie - 28-11-1994
R4 Karin MillerK. Miller	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R3 Melissa BeadmanM. Beadman	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Nabors Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Amelia Island - 06-04-1992
Q1 Rachel Ann JensenR. Ann	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Osaka - 04-02-1992
Q1 Nao AkahoriN. Akahori	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Sao Paulo - 02-12-1991
Q1 Katrina GreenmanK. Greenman	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Indianapolis - 11-11-1991
Q1 Ann HenrickssonA. Henricksson	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Brentwood - 04-11-1991
Q1 Claudine ToleafoaC. Toleafoa	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

R. A. Jensen vs L. Nabors Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. A. Jensen	Stats	L. Nabors
48.98% (72/75)	YTD Win/Loss	36.11% (26/46)
49.09% (161/167)	Sets Win/Loss	37.65% (61/101)
49.64% (1513/1535)	Games Win/Loss	44.48% (653/815)
48.98% (48/50)	Hard Win/Loss	38.46% (20/32)
52.94% (18/16)	Clay Win/Loss	30.77% (4/9)
50.00% (6/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (2/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
495.2	Average Opponent Rank	514.32
50.00% (2/2)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
54.43% (43/36)	Challenger W/L	41.18% (21/30)
0.00% (0/3)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/2)
49% (71/145)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	36% (26/72)
61% (19/31)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	62% (8/13)
50% (19/38)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (9/18)
87% (70/61)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (26/22)
13% (70/9)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (26/4)
13% (75/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (46/4)